The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
About six months after 49 states’ attorneys general agreed to a massive settlement with the nation’s largest mortgage lenders over their practices in foreclosing on consumers, many of those states haven’t put their payouts to proper use.
The national mortgage settlement, which totaled $25 billion in all, was supposed to have been allocated to helping states deal with housing issues they still face today, according to a report, “States Fall Short on Help for Housing: Six Months after Mortgage Settlement, Less than Half of States’ $2.5 Billion Has Gone for Housing,” by Enterprise. However, in many cases, that simply hasn’t happened. As of today, just $966 million of the roughly $2.5 billion allocated to states across the country for these issues has been earmarked for housing and foreclosure issues.
Another $988 million has been taken by states’ general funds, the report said. Meanwhile, Texas and Florida say they still have no clear plans at this time for the $588 million granted to them.
The good news for consumers is that in most states which received settlement money, the majority of it will be put toward housing concerns, the report said. In all, 22 states — and the District of Columbia — have earmarked 90 percent or more of those funds for housing and foreclosure, and another five will divert between 70 and 89 percent of those funds to the same concerns. In some cases, the shortfalls come because the states have already agreed to put the majority of funds toward housing, but are still undecided about what to do with a small portion.
However, discounting undecided Texas and Florida, that still leaves 20 states that received settlement funds which will put between just 0 and 50 percent of their money to housing concerns, the report said. That includes six — California, Missouri, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and New Jersey — which have already diverted the full total to their general funds. Georgia and California are, of course, among the states hardest hit by the housing meltdown of the last few years.
In all, of those states that have agreed to put even some of their settlement fund toward housing concerns, 25 say they will spend it on legal assistance for troubled homeowners, the report said. Another 21 will spend it on housing counseling.
Many consumers are still dealing with housing problems such as underwater mortgages as a result of the real estate crisis, even as property values have risen in recent months.
December 13, 2023
Mortgages