The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
It’s called the mortgage interest deduction, and it allows homeowners to deduct the interest they pay on their mortgages from their taxes. The deduction costs the government $131 billion a year.
Special interest groups including the National Association of Home Builders are gearing up for a campaign to fight the change, saying it would hurt middle class and endanger the housing market’s already fragile recovery.
[Article: Solving The Foreclosure Mess—Let’s Get Serious]
“We will oppose any limit,” Jerry Howard, chief executive of the National Association of Home Builders, told CNN. “This is an attack on the middle class.”
But whether the subsidy actually helps the middle class is the subject of a long debate. Economists James Poterba and Todd Sinai found that families earning more than $250,000 a year reap deductions 10 times greater than middle class families. A study by the Brookings Institution found that most of the deduction subsidizes the purchase of larger homes by people who would have bought anyway.
The bipartisan National Commission on Financial Responsibility and Reform, created last year to suggest ways to trim the budget deficit, suggested replacing most of the deduction with a 12% tax credit paid to all taxpayers.
“Because most of the subsidy goes to individuals who would likely own homes without the tax benefit, it has little effect on homeownership,” the Brookings Institution found. Ending the mortgage interest deduction “would benefit low- and middle-income groups,” according to the study.
[Featured Product: Research and Compare Secured Credit Card Offers on Credit.com]
The Obama administration’s proposal is far more modest. Taxpayers who earn $250,000 and up would be limited in how much they could deduct, and mortgage debt above $500,000 would no longer be eligible for an interest deduction (the current upper limit is $1 million of mortgage debt).
Nevertheless, the industries that benefit most from the mortgage deduction are gearing up to fight the proposed change. The National Association of Home Builders has created a new website to tell consumers its side of the issue. And it has partnered with the National Association of Realtors to win Congressional support House Resolution 25, which would affirm the importance of the deduction.
Image: Zechariah Judy
Editor’s note: On March 14, 2011 at 6:33 p.m., this story was updated to correct an error. Mortgage interest deduction is based on mortgage debt on the home, not on the value of the home, as originally reported.
December 13, 2023
Mortgages