The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
A glitch in Wells Fargo’s proprietary mortgage underwriting software led to hundreds of home foreclosures. An SEC filing disclosed in August revealed that a Wells Fargo “calculation error” unfairly barred 625 homeowners from mortgage modification.
“We determined that an automated calculation error may have affected the decision on whether or not to offer or approve some mortgage modifications between April 13, 2010 and Oct. 20, 2015,” said Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Tom Goyda in a statement to Business Times. “We’re very sorry that this error occurred and are providing remediation to the approximately 625 customers who may have been impacted.”
This error miscalculated attorneys’ fees, which are used decide whether or not a borrower qualifies for a mortgage modification. As a result, 400 homeowners were forced to foreclose.
To understand the significance of this calculation blunder, we first need to highlight the purpose of mortgage modifications, and how this financial safeguard could have spared hundreds of homeowners from foreclosure.
Loan modification is an alteration to lender terms. The goal is to make repayment viable when in light of prolonged missed payments. This can take on several forms including any combination of the following:
Usually, these loan features are determined at the outset of the mortgage and are, in large part, dependent on a borrower’s credit scores. A loan modification helps borrowers renew these terms and secure a more favorable loan in instances of financial hardship.
The most popular version of mortgage modification is the Home Affordable Modification Program — a facet of the Making Home Affordable federal program — but various modification options exist depending on the lender.
Lenders and borrowers strive for the same goal: repayment. Mortgage modification is a valuable renegotiation tool that can significantly reduce the likelihood of loan deferment. The Wells Fargo calculation error prevented mortgage owners from leveraging this financial aid, and this subsequently led to hundreds of unnecessary home foreclosures.
As a result, homeowners and members of congress are seeking retribution.
Wells Fargo — the second largest mortgage lender in the United States — is no stranger to controversy. Last year, Wells Fargo faced a $125 million lawsuit over falsifying records in an effort to meet sales goals.
So, while this most recent error might seem insignificant compared to past Wells Fargo mistakes, the central issue remains: hundreds of people lost their homes.
Wells Fargo has allocated $8 million in remediate funds in order to repay homeowners. However, this sum divided among the 625 borrowers that were affected by the miscalculation only amounts to approximately $12,800 per borrower, which some say does not adequately cover damages.
Two senators have been vocal in their opposition of Wells Fargo’s deficient financial fix. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, drafted a long list of questions for Wells Fargo following the miscalculation fall out, and are pushing the mortgage lender for more information on their underwriting practices and proposed solution.
Although this error occurred nearly a decade ago, it has only been made public in the past month. How this debacle will affect future underwriting practices, the homeowners in question, and Wells Fargo as a whole, remains to be seen.
If you’re concerned about your credit, you can check your three credit reports for free once a year. To track your credit more regularly, Credit.com’s free Credit Report Card is an easy-to-understand breakdown of your credit report information that uses letter grades—plus you get two free credit scores updated every 14 days.
You can also carry on the conversation on our social media platforms. Like and follow us on Facebook and leave us a tweet on Twitter.
April 11, 2023
Uncategorized
September 13, 2021
Uncategorized
August 4, 2021
Uncategorized