Home > Personal Finance > House Debit Card Interchange Hearing Favors Delay

Comments 1 Comment

DebitMacro_vamapaullIn a House Financial Services Committee hearing today, members of Congress grilled Federal Reserve Governor Sarah Bloom Raskin over the Fed’s proposed rule that could cap debit card “swipe fees” between 7-12 cents per transaction. During the hearing, members of Congress accused the Fed of “price fixing” and of ignoring the impact of these fee restrictions on small community banks and credit unions.

Several members expressed interest in delaying implementation of the proposed rule, which currently is required to be implemented July 21, 2011. Governor Raskin responded by noting that’s a decision for Congress to make.

[Resource: Credit.com’s Consumer Guide to the Proposed Debit Interchange Rule]

The mood in the first half of the hearing favored a delay, if not an outright appeal, of the Durbin Amendment. But during the second half of the hearing, the debate expanded after several business owners offered testimony reminding committee members why the legislation was enacted in the first place.

Gus Prentzas of Pavilion Florals owns a floral shop and a health club. He testified that rising interchange fees forced him to lay off an employee. He repeatedly expressed his frustration at not being able to find out the amount of fees he must pay until he gets his statement at the end of the month.

David Seltzer, Vice President and Treasurer of 7-Eleven, who also testified on behalf of the Retail Industry Leaders Association, said that after payroll, interchange is the largest cost for 7-11 stores, and he called it the “only cost beyond our control.”  He noted that interchange fees have quadrupled from $40 million in 2002 to $177 million in 2010.

Doug Kantor, Partner, Steptoe & Johnson who testified on behalf of the Merchant Payments Coalition took the more extreme position. He said that a 12 cents cap is too high and insisted that these fees should be zero.

[Featured product: Shop for prepaid debit cards]

On the other side of the argument, David Kemper, Chairman, President and C.E.O. of Commerce Bank, warned that under the current Fed proposal his bank’s profit margin will go from $35 per checking account to a $27 loss per account.

In the end, it was easy to understand the dilemma members of Congress must be in as they field opposing comments from their small business, consumer, and banking constituents.

Representative Jim Renacci (R-OH), who has experience as both a retailer and a bank board member, asked the question that hung over the hearing today; “Who is going to win and lose here?”

Image: vamapaull, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team