Home > Mortgages > Another Bad Idea to Help the Housing Market

Comments 1 Comment

A new proposal to help beleaguered homeowners keep their homes out of foreclosure would take a bad situation and make it even worse. U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-GA) and U.S. Rep. Tom Graves (R-GA) have introduced the Hardship Outlays to protect Mortgagee Equity (HOME) Act, legislation that would allow Americans to make withdrawals from their retirement accounts without penalty to make mortgage payments. (This HOME Act should not be confused with the Housing Opportunity and Mortgage Equity Act, a bill re-introduced this year by Dennis Cardoza, a Democratic Congressman from California, that would allow expanded refinancing for home loans owned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.)

[Identity Theft: Free Identity Risk Score and profile from Credit.com]

According to Representative Graves’ website:

The HOME Act allows a taxpayer to withdraw money from a qualified retirement plan penalty free to make mortgage payments toward his primary residence with a lifetime cap of $50,000 or one-half of the present value of one’s 401(k) account (whichever is smaller), so long as those funds are used for that purpose within 120 days of withdrawal. Deferred income tax otherwise due on those withdrawals would still be due to the Internal Revenue Service.

On the surface, it sounds reasonable. Why not remove penalties that may dissuade homeowners from using their own retirement savings to save their homes? But while many of the current programs designed to help homeowners have been largely ineffective, this one is truly toxic. Why?

1. It makes it easier for homeowners to throw good money after bad. Retirement funds are often safe from creditors. “Pulling funds from a 401(k) is generally a bad idea … ,” says attorney Chip Parker with Parker & DuFresne, P.A. “It is converting an exempt asset to a non-exempt asset. In other words, since 401(k) money is protected from creditors, the homeowner is being encouraged to give creditors money from a source that is off-limits otherwise.

[Featured Product: Looking for credit cards for bad credit?]

2. It’s another one-sided effort to prop up the ailing housing market. Anne Weintraub, a Sarasota, Florida-based real estate attorney with Band Weintraub who helps homeowners who are negotiating short sales, says, “The proposed Act will not help homeowners, but banks. Regardless of IRS penalties, most homeowners on fixed incomes or those who are unemployed only have their 401k and IRA funds, along with Social Security, to survive. Other homeowners are living paycheck to paycheck.” Once again, banks get paid while homeowners chip away at their financial futures.

3. These withdrawals are penalty-free but not tax-free. Homeowners may still find they owe the IRS taxes on the balance withdrawn. And that could mean they catch up on their house payments only to fall behind later when the tax bill comes due.

Parker warns that, “estimations are that the housing market will continue to slide. Therefore, the legislation is encouraging the middle class to bail out a sinking ship with their own retirement funds at the same time there are serious concerns about the future of Social Security.”

Let’s hope this isn’t the best our elected officials can come up with. If it is, we’re doomed.

[Related article: Fed: Anti-Foreclosure Programs Can Succeed]

Image: Images Money, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.


    Two words: Collective hysteria. =) … life is good, this is America, not Somalia… enjoy ur lives n stop bitchin

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team