Home > Uncategorized > Comcast Is Being Sued for Allegedly Deceiving Customers

Comments 0 Comments

Washington state is suing Comcast for more than $100 million, its attorney general’s office announced Monday. The lawsuit alleges the cable giant deceived subscribers by offering a “near-worthless” service protection plan, charging improper service fees and conducting improper credit screening.

The state is seeking refunds for more than 400,000 residents.

The lawsuit primarily takes issue with Comcast’s Service Protection Plan, a nationwide program that claims subscribers can avoid being charged for certain technician visits to their home in exchange for a $4.99 monthly fee.

According to a press release issued by Attorney General Bob Ferguson’s office, Comcast customer service routinely misrepresented limitations that applied to the plan’s coverage for Washington residents, failing to properly disclose that customers would be charged for service calls related to consumer-owned equipment and the repair of cable jumpers, connectors and splitters.

Moreover, the lawsuit alleges customer service scripts directed Comcast employees to state that the plan covers service calls “related to inside wiring” or “wiring inside your home” when, in fact, it doesn’t cover most inside wiring.

Comcast said in an email that its Service Protection Plan covered more than 99% of enrolled Washington customers’ repair calls.

“We worked with the Attorney General’s office to address every issue they raised, and we made several improvements based on their input,” the company said. “Given that we were committed to continue working collaboratively with the Attorney General’s office, we’re surprised and disappointed that they have instead chosen litigation. We stand behind our products and services, and will vigorously defend ourselves.”

A Word on Fees & Credit Checks

The lawsuit takes similar issues with the “Customer Guarantee” Comcast makes to Washington subscribers. Per the press release, Comcast charged thousands of subscribers for service calls regarding Comcast HDMI and component cables, Comcast cable cards and the installation of drop amplifiers, which fix Comcast signal problems, despite the fact that its guarantee expressly promises not to charge for service visits resulting from a Comcast equipment or network problem.

The attorney general’s office also alleges that Washington state consumers paid a deposit to Comcast, despite credit checks performed by the company showing they had high credit scores.

“This indicates that either: (a) customers paid the deposit to avoid a credit check appearing on their credit report, only to have Comcast run one anyway; or (b) customers were forced to pay the deposit despite their high credit score, contrary to Comcast’s policy,” the press release said.

Signing Up for Cable

Remember, it’s a good idea to read the terms and conditions carefully for any cable plan — or additional service package — you are considering before signing up. That way you’ll know exactly what you’re supposed to pay. (Case in point, while Comcast is accused of misrepresenting its Service Plan Protection coverage over the phone and not making information readily available to cardholders, restrictions are listed in the plan’s terms and conditions on its website.)

It’s also smart to regularly review your monthly bills for unfamiliar fees and charges.

Cable companies are in the habit of checking credit whenever you sign up for a plan — and good credit scores can help you avoid certain fees or qualify for better rates. It’s important to check your credit before you apply for any new contracts. It’s also important to monitor it for any inquiries, since they could impact your score. (You can view your free credit report summary, updated every 14 days, on Credit.com.) And, should a hard inquiry appear when it shouldn’t — say, when you didn’t authorize a credit pull — you can dispute it with the credit bureau in question.

Image: RiverNorthPhotography

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team