Home > News > Chase to Pay $166 Million for ‘Shoddy & Illegal’ Debt Collection Practices

Comments 26 Comments
Advertiser Disclosure

Disclaimer

JPMorgan Chase will pay $166 million to settle charges that it engaged in illegal debt collection activities for years, and must adhere to strict new debt collection rules, state and federal authorities announced Wednesday. The bank will also refund at least $50 million to consumers and agree to permanently end collection activities on more than half a million accounts.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and 47 state attorneys general joined in the enforcement action, which says Chase systematically broke collection rules from 2009-2013.

“Chase engaged in shoddy and illegal practices that disrupted the lives of 500,000 people,” said Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan.

The allegations include robosigning court documents when the bank was in the midst of jamming courtrooms with debt collection cases — 100,000 alone in California courts, according to a lawsuit filed in 2013 by California Attorney General Kamala Harris

“Chase filed more than 528,000 debt collections lawsuits against consumers and provided more than 150,000 sworn statements to debt buyers for their collections lawsuits against consumers, often using robosigned documents. In doing so, Chase systematically failed to prepare, review, and execute truthful statements as required by law,” the CFPB said.

Chase is also accused of collecting on so-called zombie debts — accounts that were either already settled or too old to collect on. (You can see what your state’s statute of limitations is on this map.)

“Chase sold faulty and false debts to third-party collectors, including accounts with unlawfully obtained judgments, inaccurate balances, and paid-off balances,” the CFPB alleges. “Chase also sold debts that were owed by deceased borrowers.”

Chase to Refund Overpayments Plus 25%

In a statement, Chase called the activities described in the enforcement action “legacy issues.”

“(The action) covers issues from several years ago for a small percentage of credit card credit card customers who defaulted on their credit card debt,” Chase said. “We are pleased to resolve these legacy issues and are working to complete our remediation of affected credit card customers.”

To settle the case, Chase will refund consumers who were sued between Jan. 1, 2009, and June 30, 2014, for amounts paid above what the consumer owed when the debt was referred for litigation, plus 25% of the excess amount paid.

The settlement also puts a series of new rules in place governing how Chase can attempt to collect debts in the future. While the rules will apply only to Chase, Madigan said they should serve as an example for all banks and debt collectors.

“They should be used as a template to reform the entire debt collection industry,” she said.

The rules include: Chase must prohibit its debt buyers from reselling accounts to other debt buyers; it must confirm debts before they are sold to debt buyers; and prior to selling debts, Chase must provide account-level documentation to debt buyers confirming that the debts are accurate and enforceable.

The settlement amount includes a $30 million civil penalty paid to the CFPB, a $30 million civil penalty paid to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on a related matter, and $106 million in payments to states.

“We will continue to be vigilant in taking action against deceptive debt sales and collections practices that exploit consumers,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray.

If you’re worried you have a debt in collection or a “zombie debt” like some Chase customers experienced, you can get your free annual credit reports at AnnualCreditReport.com to check for negative information that could be affecting your credit score. You can also check your credit scores for free every month on Credit.com.

More on Managing Debt:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.



Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team