The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
Several members expressed interest in delaying implementation of the proposed rule, which currently is required to be implemented July 21, 2011. Governor Raskin responded by noting that’s a decision for Congress to make.
[Resource: Credit.com’s Consumer Guide to the Proposed Debit Interchange Rule]
The mood in the first half of the hearing favored a delay, if not an outright appeal, of the Durbin Amendment. But during the second half of the hearing, the debate expanded after several business owners offered testimony reminding committee members why the legislation was enacted in the first place.
Gus Prentzas of Pavilion Florals owns a floral shop and a health club. He testified that rising interchange fees forced him to lay off an employee. He repeatedly expressed his frustration at not being able to find out the amount of fees he must pay until he gets his statement at the end of the month.
David Seltzer, Vice President and Treasurer of 7-Eleven, who also testified on behalf of the Retail Industry Leaders Association, said that after payroll, interchange is the largest cost for 7-11 stores, and he called it the “only cost beyond our control.” He noted that interchange fees have quadrupled from $40 million in 2002 to $177 million in 2010.
Doug Kantor, Partner, Steptoe & Johnson who testified on behalf of the Merchant Payments Coalition took the more extreme position. He said that a 12 cents cap is too high and insisted that these fees should be zero.
[Featured product: Shop for prepaid debit cards]
On the other side of the argument, David Kemper, Chairman, President and C.E.O. of Commerce Bank, warned that under the current Fed proposal his bank’s profit margin will go from $35 per checking account to a $27 loss per account.
In the end, it was easy to understand the dilemma members of Congress must be in as they field opposing comments from their small business, consumer, and banking constituents.
Representative Jim Renacci (R-OH), who has experience as both a retailer and a bank board member, asked the question that hung over the hearing today; “Who is going to win and lose here?”
Image: vamapaull, via Flickr.com
April 11, 2023
Uncategorized
September 13, 2021
Uncategorized
August 4, 2021
Uncategorized