The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
“Basically, MI companies cover the lender’s loss during foreclosure. Since they cover this loss, they later are trying to seek reimbursement from the homeowner. The homeowner essentially owes the MI company money rather than the foreclosing lender,” explains Troy Doucet, an attorney with Doucet & Associates, LLC and author of 23 Legal Defenses to Foreclosure.
But Doucet isn’t convinced that this is clearly disclosed to homeowners when they obtain mortgages and agree to pay for MI, and he’s been representing clients challenging claims by mortgage insurance companies. He says private mortgage insurance companies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and even the federal government (for FHA and VA loans) are going after homeowners for these losses.
[Credit Calculator: Use Credit.com’s Free Credit Report Card]
“I’d frame it this way,” he says. “A mortgage insurance company shouldn’t be able to collect against a borrower any more than her auto insurance company could collect against her after paying an auto claim on her behalf.”
“This is a poorly understood area,” agrees R. Wilson Freyermuth, a law professor with the University of Missouri. But he believes it’s “misunderstood by consumers.” They think, “I am paying this and I must be paying it for my own benefit. But private mortgage insurance is really insuring the lender and not the borrower. When the private insurer has to pay off the lender because it suffered a loss, that loss will typically be passed on to the borrower.”
Subrogation is the basic principal behind these transactions. Subrogation is defined as:
the act of subrogating; specifically : the assumption by a third party (as a second creditor or an insurance company) of another’s legal right to collect a debt or damages. (Mirriam Webster dictionary)
In other words, the right to collect is subrogated to, or assumed by, a third party, often an insurance company.
[Related Article: Underwater On Your Home? Your Six Options]
Using an auto insurance example, Freyermuth poses a hypothetical scenario:
“Suppose I have a policy with State Farm. You are driving drunk and run into me, and you are uninsured. State Farm pays me off. They become subrogated and can come after you to the same extent that I could have.” Then why don’t auto insurance companies routinely go after their customers when they have to pay claims? He explains: “My (own) insurance company can’t (generally) subrogate a claim back against me.”
In the case of mortgage insurance, the insurance is for the benefit of the mortgage company, not the borrower. That’s why a borrower who pays the mortgage insurance premium may be pursued for payment by the mortgage insurer after a claim is paid.
If It Happens To You
What happens if you’ve lost your home and are now being hounded by a mortgage insurer, Fannie or Freddie, or a governmental agency?
“Before taking any course of action, the best advice I can offer is to contact your lender and then consult a real estate attorney regarding your rights,” says Andrew Schrage, co-owner of Money Crashers Personal Finance. He adds, “If you end up owing money, just be sure that you aren’t paying twice. If your original lender received money by filing a PMI claim and later sells your mortgage, there are situations where you won’t have to pay this amount to the new lender.”
[Featured Products: Research and Compare Mortgage Rates at Credit.com]
Getting good legal advice is essential, agrees Doucet, who says, “People jump out of the frying pan and into the fire” when they walk away from or lose their homes. Whether or not the insurer or guarantor can pursue the borrower depends on a number of factors including whether the loan is a recourse or non-recourse loan, as well as whether the statute of limitations for collecting on deficiencies has already passed. If a mortgage insurer is threatening a lawsuit, or has already obtained a judgment against the borrower, it may make sense to talk with a bankruptcy attorney.
As the losses to lenders and insurers pile up, homeowners may find that those mortgage insurance premiums they’ve been paying will be used to collect from them.
Image: Krystian Olszanski, via Flickr.com
December 13, 2023
Mortgages