The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, act as legal, financial or credit advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not be current. This website may contain links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; we do not recommend or endorse the contents of any third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney, accountant or credit counselor to obtain advice with respect to their particular situation. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or not act on the basis of information on this site. Always seek personal legal, financial or credit advice for your relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client or fiduciary relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website owner, authors, contributors, contributing firms, or their respective employers.
Credit.com receives compensation for the financial products and services advertised on this site if our users apply for and sign up for any of them. Compensation is not a factor in the substantive evaluation of any product.
If the bill, or one like it, fails to pass before the end of the Congressional session in September, the law would revert back to its old, lower limit. That could further damage the market for new and exiting homes, the senators warned.
[Featured Product: Looking for bad credit credit cards?]
“Allowing existing loan limits to expire during this difficult economic time would make a struggling housing market even weaker,” Johnny Isakson (R-GA) said in a press release. “I am also concerned that failing to extend these limits will make it even more difficult for the average homebuyer get a mortgage and buy a home when credit is already tight.”
At issue is the definition of “conforming” mortgages, which are loans that can be bought from lenders by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Veterans Administration and the Federal Housing Administration. Under the regular rules, the government cannot buy any loan worth more than $625,000.
In February 2008, President Bush signed the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, which increased the maximum limit to $729, 750 in areas with the most expensive housing. The measure was supposed to be temporary. But if the bill introduced by Senators Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Johnny Isakson (R-GA) and Barbara Boxer (D – CA) passes, that “temporary” rule won’t expire until 2013.
The cap is supposed to make sure that taxpayers are not subsidizing wealthy homeowners. But in some parts of the country, bringing back the old limits could hurt regular consumers, the senators argue.
[Related Article: Senate Considers Ways to Bring Trust Back to Mortgages]
The effects could be terrible,” Menendez said in a press release. “New Jersey has some of the highest home prices in the nation and allowing these limits to lapse would hurt middle class homeowners and prospective buyers.”
The measure appears to have broad support in Washington. In addition to the bipartisan sponsorship, an increasingly rare occurrence in the current Congress, the Obama administration published a white paper in February that called for the subsidy for jumbo loans to be extended.
Image: Sam Bowman, Flickr.com
December 13, 2023
Mortgages